IMDb >
For the Love of Movies: The Story of American Film Criticism (2009)
Watch It
Buy it at Amazon
Rent it at Blockbuster.com
Discuss in Boards More at IMDb Pro Add to My Movies Update Data
BETA
Discuss in Boards More at IMDb Pro Add to My Movies Update Data
Quicklinks
Top Links
trailers and videosfull cast and crewtriviaofficial sitesmemorable quotesOverview
main detailscombined detailsfull cast and crewcompany creditstv scheduleAwards & Reviews
user commentsexternal reviewsnewsgroup reviewsawardsuser ratingsparents guiderecommendationsmessage boardPlot & Quotes
plot summarysynopsisplot keywordsAmazon.com summarymemorable quotesFun Stuff
triviagoofssoundtrack listingcrazy creditsalternate versionsmovie connectionsFAQOther Info
merchandising linksbox office/businessrelease datesfilming locationstechnical specslaserdisc detailsDVD detailsliterature listingsNewsDeskPromotional
taglines trailers and videos posters photo galleryExternal Links
showtimesofficial sitesmiscellaneousphotographssound clipsvideo clipsFor the Love of Movies: The Story of American Film Criticism (2009) More at IMDbPro »
| Videos (see all 2 NEW) |
Overview
User Rating:
Contact:
View company contact information for For the Love of Movies: The Story of American Film Criticism on IMDbPro.Genre:
DocumentaryNewsDesk:
(3 articles)
SFIFF52—For The Love of Movies: The Story of American Film Criticism (From Twitch. 23 April 2009, 12:48 PM, PDT)
SXSW Review: For the Love of Movies: The Story of American Film Criticism
(From Cinematical. 20 March 2009, 8:45 AM, PDT)
User Comments:
See "For the Love of Movies" and get the other perspective that is being shut out from our society. more (4 total)Cast
(Credited cast)| Jami Bernard | ... | Herself | |
| Kevin Carragee | ... | (voice) | |
| Jason Carter | ... | (voice) | |
| Patricia Clarkson | ... | Narrator (voice) | |
| Richard Corliss | ... | Himself | |
| David D'Arcy | ... | Himself | |
| Roger Ebert | ... | Himself | |
| Otis Ferguson | ... | Himself | |
| Owen Gleiberman | ... | Himself | |
| Molly Haskell | ... | Herself | |
| J. Hoberman | ... | Himself | |
| Ed Hoopman | ... | (voice) | |
| Harlan Jacobson | ... | Himself | |
| Stanley Kauffmann | ... | Himself | |
| Stuart Klawans | ... | Himself | |
| Harry Jay Knowles | ... | Himself (as Harry Knowles) | |
| Karina Longworth | ... | Herself | |
| Leonard Maltin | ... | Himself | |
| Janet Maslin | ... | Herself | |
| Elvis Mitchell | ... | Himself | |
| Wesley Morris | ... | Himself | |
| Lisa Nesselson | ... | Herself | |
| John Powers | ... | Himself | |
| Rex Reed | ... | Himself | |
| B. Ruby Rich | ... | Herself | |
| Kim Romano | ... | (voice) | |
| Jonathan Rosenbaum | ... | Himself | |
| Andrew Sarris | ... | Himself | |
| Richard Schickel | ... | Himself | |
| Lisa Schwarzbaum | ... | Herself | |
| A.O. Scott | ... | Himself | |
| David Sterritt | ... | Himself | |
| Mike Szymanski | ... | Himself | |
| Kenneth Turan | ... | Himself | |
| Scott Weinberg | ... | Himself | |
| Lewis D. Wheeler | ... | (voice) | |
| Michael Wilmington | ... | Himself |
Additional Details
Parents Guide:
Add content advisory for parentsRuntime:
80 minCountry:
USALanguage:
EnglishColor:
ColorFAQ
This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.more (4 total)
Message Boards
Discuss this movie with other users on IMDb message board for For the Love of Movies: The Story of American Film Criticism (2009)Recommendations
If you enjoyed this title, our database also recommends:
Show more recommendations
|
|
|
|
|
| 1362: The Kensington Enigma | Celebrity Art Show | Cherry Valley | For Liberty: How the Ron Paul Revolution Watered the Withered Tree of Liberty | Incest: A Family Tragedy |
|
IMDb User Rating:
|
IMDb User Rating:
|
IMDb User Rating:
|
IMDb User Rating:
|
IMDb User Rating:
|
Related Links
| Full cast and crew | Company credits | External reviews |
| News articles | IMDb Documentary section | IMDb USA section |
| Add this title to MyMovies |



I recently viewed Gerald Peary's "For the Love of Movies: The Story of American Film Criticism," at the Lake Placid Film Forum. It drew a small crowd. It wasn't aided by the seasonable weather, or its matinée schedule. But the audience knew there was something genuine about it. For the first time, to my knowledge, a critic has taken their discussion to the screen in order to prove the influence of film critique on cinema culture. The result was a fascinating look back to the beginning of the medium up to the modern age of internet based critics.
The film gives us a brief history of film review, from the early writings of Robert Sherwood, to the debating Andrew Sarris and Pauline Kael. It further goes into the age of recognized television personalities like Roger Ebert and Gene Siskel leading up to the current realm where printed media is on the way out and people look to the web for reviews.
The film asks its audience the question of why do we need film critics? Wesley Morris of the Boston Globe argues that they "expand and inform the reader about what is more than just a movie." Stuart Kalwans of The Nation further explains that "criticism is about your relationship to the work, the world and the shifting ways of that world."
Each of these opinions is correct. However, a mentor of mine who recently passed away left these words"I believe in writing and the power of art to transform consciousness." His name was Donald Kearns, a local resident of Plattsburgh NY who loved film and literature. It is my belief that this is the true nature of film critique, as is any critical opinion: to allow the reader to see another perspective. The film clearly illustrates that many of the original recognized film critics, like Sarris, were devout film lovers. The art of cinema set them free and provided for intellectual stimulation that encouraged their discussions.
One of the reasons that I enjoyed this film so much was because of my own interest in film review. Several years ago I wrote for a local news-magazine near my hometown. I wrote a review for every movie that I saw theatrically, although only a handful were ever published. But it allowed me, a lonely film buff, the opportunity to reach out to others and create a discussion. In so doing, I met the most extraordinary people: film lovers, writers, exhibitors, musicians, professors and people from all walks of life. And every one of them had something to comment on, whether they liked the movies or not.
Moreover, "For the Love of Movies" expanded my own knowledge not only of the review process, but of influential theories by Sarris and Kael. Their collected works influenced filmmakers of their generation and the next. But as we head father into the future, and critique jobs become eliminated by online clip-quotes, movie marketing campaigns only emphasize what is big, loud and aggressive. As such, we lose something so valuablethe genuine voice of those who love film.
There is debate between filmmakers and critics as some movies reviewed are poorly received. Filmmakers may ask the question to critics, do you think you can make a better movie? Maybe they can. Maybe they cannot. The truth is that it does not matter. Critics are connoisseurs of film. They do not have to go and produce something better because that's not their job. My advice to filmmakers is to take it all in stride. The process of making a movie is like crafting an art form. Not everyone will appreciate your perspective. After all, a person can be a wine lover and have never made their own bottle. And how many people do you know who love cars but have no idea what is going on beneath the hood.
Alarmingly enough, over 28 major film critics for printed journals have lost their jobs in recent years. The situation is not helped by the current economic times, as well as the push to websites. Some formerly employed critics are now heading to the web. However, the internet has given rise to its own breedJames Berardinelli is a perfect example. He is a web based film critic who can actually write a fine review whether you agree with him or not. But there are so many others who only comment on what is flashy or the current fads in the market. Therefore, how can their opinions be justified if they cannot provide a backdrop to compare a film against?
My advice to the average reader seeking movie recommendations is trust your best judgment. It's easy to see the hacks and the ones who actually care about film. Even with the shift from print media to online sources, critics will go on. There's always going to be a different perspective out there that deserves its recognition. But who will be the next film critic, online or in print, to truly change the way films are perceived? We'll just have to wait and see. In the meantime, see "For the Love of Movies" and get the other perspective that is being shut out from our society.