Home
search
more | tips
IMDb > Peter Pan (2003)
Peter Pan
Quicklinks
Top Links
trailers and videosfull cast and crewtriviaofficial sitesmemorable quotes
Overview
main detailscombined detailsfull cast and crewcompany creditstv schedule
Awards & Reviews
user commentsexternal reviewsnewsgroup reviewsawardsuser ratingsparents guiderecommendationsmessage board
Plot & Quotes
plot summaryplot synopsisplot keywordsAmazon.com summarymemorable quotes
Fun Stuff
triviagoofssoundtrack listingcrazy creditsalternate versionsmovie connectionsFAQ
Other Info
merchandising linksbox office/businessrelease datesfilming locationstechnical specslaserdisc detailsDVD detailsliterature listingsNewsDesk
Promotional
taglines trailers and videos posters photo gallery
External Links
showtimesofficial sitesmiscellaneousphotographssound clipsvideo clips

Photos (see all 43 | slideshow) Videos (see all 2)

Overview

User Rating:
7.1/10   12,973 votes
Director:
P.J. Hogan
Writers (WGA):
J.M. Barrie (play)
P.J. Hogan (screenplay) ...
more
Release Date:
25 December 2003 (USA) more
Tagline:
Living would be an awfully big adventure. more
Plot:
The Darling family children receive a visit from Peter Pan, who takes them to Never Never Land where an ongoing war with the evil Pirate Captain Hook is taking place. full summary | full synopsis
Awards:
3 wins & 11 nominations more
User Comments:
A superb rendition of a favourite of adults and children more

Cast

 (Cast overview, first billed only)
Create a character page for: ?

People Viewing This Page May Also Be Interested In These Sponsored Links (what's this?)


Additional Details

MPAA:
Rated PG for adventure action sequences and peril.
Runtime:
113 min
Country:
USA | UK
Language:
English
Color:
Color (Technicolor)
Aspect Ratio:
2.35 : 1 more
Certification:
Switzerland:8 (canton of Zurich) | Iceland:L | Iceland:LH (video rating) | Malaysia:U | South Korea:All | Argentina:Atp | Australia:PG | Brazil:Livre | Chile:TE | Czech Republic:U | Denmark:7 | Finland:K-7 | France:U | Germany:12 | India:U | Netherlands:MG6 | Norway:11 (original rating) | Norway:7 (re-rating on appeal) | Peru:PT | Philippines:G | Portugal:M/6 | Singapore:PG | Spain:T | Sweden:7 | Switzerland:6 (canton of the Grisons) | Switzerland:7 (canton of Geneva) | Switzerland:7 (canton of Vaud) | UK:PG (cut) | USA:PG (certificate #39544)
Filming Locations:
Australia more
MOVIEmeter: ?
V 2% since last week why?

Fun Stuff

Trivia:
"Nana" was a Newfoundland, a breed particularly good with children, not a St. Bernard as used in the film. J. M. Barrie modeled Nana after his own dog, a Landseer Newf. Newfoundland dogs were very popular in Victorian England and were actually used to supervise children. more
Goofs:
Continuity: When the crocodile appears at the Black Castle, a close-up of the boat shows Wendy leaning over the side closest to the crocodile, but on the next shot from Hook and Peter's view, she's sitting on the opposite side closest to the rock. more
Quotes:
Peter: Wendy? One girl's worth more than 20 boys.
Wendy: [under bed sheets] You really think so?
Peter: I live with boys, the lost boys, they are well named!
Wendy: Who are they?
[asking as she gets out from under sheets and makes Peter fall off the bed]
Peter: Children who fall out of their prams when the nurse is not looking. If they are not claimed in seven days, they are sent to the Neverland.
Wendy: Are there girls too?
Peter: Girls are much to clever to fall out of their prams.
[he says as he looks through the heart in Wendy's bed]
more
Movie Connections:
References Mary Poppins (1964) more
Soundtrack:
String Quartet Op. 76, No. 5 more

FAQ

Who plays the older Wendy and her daughter Jane in the alternate ending?
Is this movie too scary for children?
The "Hidden Kiss" - I don't get it?
more
96 out of 110 people found the following comment useful:-
A superb rendition of a favourite of adults and children, 7 October 2004
Author: Alex Rutherford (acrutherford2004) from Newcastle, England

This is by far the most accurate and striking adaptation of the J.M. Barrie favourite that has yet been made. Indeed it is difficult to see how it could have been better.

Whilst I'm writing here in praise of the film, I feel I must take issue with the comments of Mr John Ulmer who criticised the film for a number of reasons. I seek to defend the story of Peter Pan and in particular this version. Firstly, it was said that this version has sexual over/undertones.

Erm... well yes... any accurate portrayal of the story would have, as these subtleties are present en masse in the book, indeed more so in the book than in the film it could be argued. It is precisely this evident descent towards Wendy's loss of innocence that both disturbs and excites adult readers of the books and this is quite intentional. Children who are not of an age to appreciate this level are untouched by it but rather take delight in the glorious idea of never having to grow up but instead being allowed to play forever. Indeed the relationship between Pan and Hook is the struggle of youth to overcome the onset of age (singular human vanity and innocent childish rebellion combined). I do not believe that this film's handling of this aspect of the book was merely present in "sick adult humour", I believe that it was beautifully hinted at in a way which would stimulate adult appreciation and childish fascination in the character of Pan.

I should like to make mention of the parallel which Mr Ulmer draws between this version of Peter Pan and Jumanji (namely the use of the same actors to play the adversary and the father of the lead character) is not just a trick put in to hark back to that film. Indeed the tradition of the same actor playing the role of Mr Darling AND Hook dates back to the story's original appearance as a stage play at the turn of the century and has been carried on on most occasions since then, though I concede that the Disney version (a far less worthy and sterilised version) failed to keep this tradition up.

As for the point at which the two boys are hung upside down in their nightshirts, I thought it was funny, as did the rest of the audience in the theatre and we certainly weren't there with a red pen counting the number of bottom shots as Mr Ulmer appears to have done. This film is full of charming humour, adult overtones for the adults, childish fantasy and wonderment for those of the appropriate age. The acting is superb in all areas and I must make particular mention of both Ludivine Sagnier as a wickedly funny Tink and of course Rachel Hurd-Wood whose screen debut showed her as a previously undiscovered talent who will surely go far. All the others were excellent also.

All in all this film rekindled my love of the book which I have now re-read a number of times and makes up for all those years Pan has spent in the Disney wilderness.

Was the above comment useful to you?
more

Message Boards

Discuss this title with other users on IMDb message board for Peter Pan (2003)
Recent Posts (updated daily)User
Peter actually loses both fights. norman891
Johnny Depp makes the perfect... nadine1995
Jason Isaacs is one sexy Cpt Hook. Stacey618
The Cutest line or scene in the movie is.... billa_lime03
Sheet Music LeeLeeBoops
more

Recommendations

If you enjoyed this title, our database also recommends:
- - - - -
Peter Pan Return to Never Land Hook Peter Pan Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man's Chest
IMDb User Rating:
IMDb User Rating:
IMDb User Rating:
IMDb User Rating:
IMDb User Rating:
Show more recommendations

Related Links

Full cast and crew Company credits External reviews
News articles IMDb Adventure section IMDb USA section
Add this title to MyMovies

You may report errors and omissions on this page to the IMDb database managers. They will be examined and if approved will be included in a future update. Clicking the 'Update' button will take you through a step-by-step process.